Complimentary 90-second self-assessment · instant result

Can your team see the recorded property-safety dates and reported actions—without chasing each site?

0 of 7 answered

01Is there one current schedule covering every site and each relevant property-safety discipline?
02Can each entry be traced quickly to the correct report, certificate or supporting record?
03Does every open finding have a named owner, target date and visible resolution status?
04Is it clear which records are routine servicing and which are statutory inspections or examinations?
05Can central management see overdue, due-soon and unclear items without contacting every site?
06Is contractor competence or registration evidence recorded against the discipline and scope supplied?
07When a record is missing or a report raises an action, is the escalation route understood and followed?

Your result is shown before we ask for contact details.No personal or resident information is needed.

What this checks

The management layer between planned work, site teams and supporting records.

The questions focus on whether records can be found, exceptions are visible and reported findings have an owner, target date and documented status. It is an operational self-assessment, not a review of technical adequacy or legal compliance.

Evidence visibility

Can the right document, date and scope be found quickly?

Portfolio control

Can central teams see exceptions without rebuilding the picture?

Action ownership

Does each reported finding have an assigned owner, target date and supporting status record?

If the result shows limited visibility

Turn five supplied site record sets into one decision-ready view.

The fixed £750 desk review provides an evidence register, a 12-month schedule and a prioritised next-step plan based on the records supplied.

See the five-home review